Both sides claim a deal. Neither agrees on what it actually says.
The most consequential diplomatic story on the planet right now: a potential end to a shooting war, with the US and Pakistan predicting a Sunday signing while Iran publicly disputes the timeline. Rich left/right split on whether this is triumph or capitulation, with Israel's ceasefire complaints adding a third dimension.
Moulton called it 'a surrender document' — the deal leaves Iran's nuclear program intact per AP, with thorny issues deferred 60 days.
Trump extracted Iran's public pledge against nukes and Hormuz reopening — no prior U.S. administration halted active U.S.-Iran hostilities.
Qatari mediators flew to Tehran Sunday for final touches per AP, but Al Jazeera noted no signing appeared on Trump's public schedule.
Hidden truth: Per AP, the deal explicitly defers Iran's nuclear program and proxy networks to a 60-day framework — the war's core issues, unresolved.Read the full breakdown →
Is a 60-day framework that defers nuclear and proxy issues a meaningful step toward peace?
More like this
US Politics100 days in, no deal: Who actually controls this war?
US PoliticsNetanyahu struck Iran hours after promising Trump he wouldn't
US PoliticsTrump confirms calling Netanyahu 'f***ing crazy' over Lebanon bombing plan
US PoliticsTrump says Iran deal 'over next week' while Congress moves to limit war powers
US Politics100 days in, no deal: Who actually controls this war?
US PoliticsNetanyahu struck Iran hours after promising Trump he wouldn't
US PoliticsTrump confirms calling Netanyahu 'f***ing crazy' over Lebanon bombing plan
US Politics